Quizzes, rubrics and the grading workflow
Assess learners with quizzes built from question banks, assignments graded against rubrics, and surveys for feedback — with a grading workflow that keeps human judgement where it belongs.
What's included
- Question banks — build, tag and reuse questions; randomise and draw from banks per quiz. QTI exchange (Pro and above) imports and exports banks between systems.
- Automated grading — objective quizzes mark themselves; results feed analytics immediately.
- Manual grading workflow — assignments, rubric-based marking and a gradebook, with corrections tracked by history.
- Blind marking — mark anonymously; identities are revealed only when you choose.
- Accommodations — extra time and other adjustments recorded per learner with a justification.
- Secure exams — locked-down exam launch, and proctoring incidents queued for human review.
- Similarity review Beta — submissions go through a similarity review workflow; today the provider adapter is simulated and results are ingested by staff, so it makes no compliance claims.
- Peer and group assessments — learners review each other against configured criteria.
How grading works
- Learner submits a quiz or assignment.
- Objective questions grade automatically; assignments queue for an assessor.
- The assessor marks against the rubric — blind if configured — and the grade flows to the gradebook, analytics and the learner.
- Final grades for consequential decisions are recorded by people: AI evaluation of submissions Beta is advisory only — staff-only actions produce final grades.
Plan availability
- Quizzes & question banks, rubric assignments, automated + manual grading, surveys, peer & group assessments — every plan, including Free (question banks: 50 questions Free, 5,000 Pro, unlimited Max)
- Blind marking, accommodations, secure exam launch & proctoring incident review, similarity review workflow, assessment analytics, QTI exchange — Pro plans and above
Honest limits
Similarity review runs on a simulated provider adapter today and makes no compliance claims. AI-assisted evaluation of submissions is advisory only — final grades are always recorded by staff.
Questions people ask
Can we randomise questions so two learners don't see the same quiz?
Yes — draw randomly from tagged question banks to build different quizzes per learner.
Can assessors mark without seeing who submitted?
Yes — blind marking hides identities until you reveal them.
How do you handle learners who need extra time?
Assessment accommodations record adjustments like extra time per learner, with a justification on file.
Does AI grade the work?
No. AI evaluation is advisory and clearly labelled; final grades are always recorded by a person.
Next step. Bring your assessment criteria — scope it with us.